Finally, an SMF 2.0 Update

[MultiformeIngegno]

Will Saguaro know the post content before the user writes it?

[DoctorMalboro]

Better yet... will Saguaro have a time machine?

[trebul]

Saguaro = SMF world domination

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it!

[live627]

thantos?

[Acans]

Saguaro = SMF world domination

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it!

QUICKLY SOMEBODY BAN HIM, HE KNOWS TO MUCH!!!!!

[MultiformeIngegno]

CALL THE SMF SECURITY SQUAD, NOW!! ALL THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED!!

ACTIVATE PLAN B!

[BrBerg]

Hmm... since i think SMF Gold won't be out until IE9 is released(the Beta is already in September!)... will there be any plans for support for it? or do we all have to click "Run in Compatibility Mode"?

[flapjack]

I think you need to ask MS about that

[Adish - (F.L.A.M.E.R)]

Hmm... since i think SMF Gold won't be out until IE9 is released(the Beta is already in September!)... will there be any plans for support for it? or do we all have to click "Run in Compatibility Mode"?

Ohhhh booooy! That will probably delay things further. Just tell MS to quit making IE, it is useless piece of junk!

[Nao 尚]

In IE, compatibility mode can be forced in the HTML code...

[Akyhne]

Not many. All We're doing is fixing things for cross browser support (IE sux) and tweaking a few paddings and floats here and there. So there are some minor template changes but nothing like the last lot.

You can run an RC3 theme on the latest svn and it'll work just fine. Some of the padding in RC3 themes will look a bit wonky on some pages but you wont notice much else except that things will be less broken in some browsers. From a themer's point of view it's not  major drama.

I really hope RC4 introduces the final css changes. it's really exhausting to update themes. RC2 -> RC3 sucked.

[Antechinus]

Yup, that's what we're aiming for.

[BrBerg]

Thanks for you answers all. I tryed to go to the forums at this site with 4th IE9 Test, and there isnt any compatibility mode needed xD. Just works fine

[Antechinus]

Hell, you mean Microsoft are doing things right for a change?

[live627]

Stop bashing IE!!

IE9 is very standards compliant, more so than FF3.6

[excaliburj]

Stop bashing IE!!

IE9 is very standards compliant, more so than FF3.6

Well, if you're going to compare a preview release, do it for both.

IE9 gets a 95/100 on the Acid3 test (compared to 94/100 for the current FF and a 20/100 for IE8 - which shows why IE DESERVES the bashing). But the 4.0 beta3 preview of FireFox scores 97/100.

But, I'll admit that it's good that IE has finally decided to join the rest of the world.

[live627]

All you have is the acid3 test to compare with. Heh.

The IE subject was covered before. It isn't hell. It is still catching up to the world. Live on.

[excaliburj]

That's far from 'all', just one easily checked metric for not-yet-finalized applications. Still, it's a lot more documentation than YOU provided for YOUR claim.

The simple fact that this far on in the game IE's still catching up speaks volumes.

[Powerbob]

I thought this topic was about an update on SMF 2.0 not a contest between IE and FF

[Antechinus]

It's the internet. Everything is about IE vs FF.