TinyPortal

[jsx]

Thanks for the information, after entering a new path and saving the settings, I still see the old path. Maybe I'm adding the wrong path?

Old path:

/home/username/websites/mydomain.pl/tp-images/

New path:

/home/username/domains/mydomain.pl/tp-images/

[@rjen]

We have seen something like this earlier this year. I have fixed it in the latest version of TinyPortal.

It would be the simplest solution if you install Tinyportal 3.0.2 beta.

I can send you a download link if you want

[@rjen]

Here it is:

https://www.tinyportal.net/index.php?action=tportal;sa=download;dl=item3

let me know if you download it, then I will remove it...

[jsx]

I installed this version and the old path still exists after saving the setting.

[@rjen]

There is a self explanatory help text included about how to reset. It would be nice to read the instructions...

[jsx]

Ah, sorry I didn't understand, I deleted the path and it saved the correct one. Thank you for your quick help.

[Emiliano_Zapata]

Is not it better to focus on forum instead of a Portal? There is NukeViet but nobody use it.You [nofollow] spend time on TinyPortal, many SMF users do not use it...Internet social environment need to find a way to make sense.Why to spend so many time on things does not work?

[@rjen]

Because Tinyportal DOES work?

[Arantor]

Is not it better to focus on forum instead of a Portal? There is NukeViet but nobody use it.You spend time on TinyPortal, many SMF users do not use it...Internet social environment need to find a way to make sense.Why to spend so many time on things does not work?

Because many forums do not work as pure forums, one must have other content and material with which to attract people to the site, to then have discussions about.

Your setup is even more prone to this problem by deliberately fragmenting your own user base before you begin.

[Emiliano_Zapata]

Is not it better to focus on forum instead of a Portal? There is NukeViet but nobody use it.You [nofollow] spend time on TinyPortal, many SMF users do not use it...Internet social environment need to find a way to make sense.Why to spend so many time on things does not work?

Because many forums do not work as pure forums, one must have other content and material with which to attract people to the site, to then have discussions about.

Your setup is even more prone to this problem by deliberately fragmenting your own user base before you begin.

Communication is a better option.

[intelpentium]

thank you

[intelpentium]

thank you

hxxp:hektodetik.com/lifestyle/wanita-taurus-cocok-dengan-zodiak-apa-cari-tahu-disini/ [nonactive]

[Arantor]

Is not it better to focus on forum instead of a Portal? There is NukeViet but nobody use it.You spend time on TinyPortal, many SMF users do not use it...Internet social environment need to find a way to make sense.Why to spend so many time on things does not work?

Because many forums do not work as pure forums, one must have other content and material with which to attract people to the site, to then have discussions about.

Your setup is even more prone to this problem by deliberately fragmenting your own user base before you begin.

Communication is a better option.

No point communicating to an audience of 1.

[Emiliano_Zapata]

Is not it better to focus on forum instead of a Portal? There is NukeViet but nobody use it.You [nofollow] spend time on TinyPortal, many SMF users do not use it...Internet social environment need to find a way to make sense.Why to spend so many time on things does not work?

Because many forums do not work as pure forums, one must have other content and material with which to attract people to the site, to then have discussions about.

Your setup is even more prone to this problem by deliberately fragmenting your own user base before you begin.

Communication is a better option.

No point communicating to an audience of 1.

If not communication, which way do you send messages to another person? Use a language.Not many languages.

[@rjen]

Since this discussion has nothing to do with TinyPortal, can you please move it else?

[Arantor]

It sort of does, as the fundamental question of what a portal is good for, namely presenting information in the forum, but also adding information alongside the forum (a necessity for almost any community at this point)

[cookdandbombd]

The latest update has mucked up the img tags when people use only the "height" attritbute exclusively - quoting a user:

The 'height' attribute is set in the HTML as expected, but it's overridden by a CSS rule in tp-style.css:

Code Select Expand

.tp_article_inner img, .tp_article img, .bbc_img {
    height: auto;
    max-width: 100%;
}

It's the 'height: auto' that's overriding the set height. Maybe just removing that declaration would work but perhaps it would break things somewhere else. It may be safer to split the rule in two so there's a rule without 'height: auto' that only applies to '.bbc_img', which is the part of the selector that matches images in posts.

I expect it would be better to add a CSS rule that undoes this rather than changing the existing style sheet. Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be possible in this case, I can't find a value for 'height' that would override 'auto' and make it act like there was no 'height' declaration. It seems like 'height: initial' or 'height: unset' should do this, or maybe 'height: fit-content', but none of these works and I'm not sure why.

Not sure what the best way to fix it is myself, but said I would bug report it.  SMF 2.1.4, thanks guys.

[@rjen]

That css is rule is there specifically meant to target images in tinyportal articles if I am remembering correctly. That is needed there for responsive behaviour.

Please explain what use case this is iterfering with: WHERE are users adding images with height settings? I forum posts?

[Arantor]

.bbc_img will end up targeting all img tags in regular posts. But it is a sensible rule generally to ensure responsive sizing.

[@rjen]

.bbc_img will end up targeting all img tags in regular posts. But it is a sensible rule generally to ensure responsive sizing.

you are right, my bad.

Checking the .css file it is not dependent on screen size, so it will affect the images in posts as well.
Cannot be sure why it is there, but if you want it gone you can edit tp-style.css and remove this bit

Change

Code Select Expand

/* Images in articles */
.tp_article_inner img, .tp_article img, .bbc_img {
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
to

Code Select Expand

/* Images in articles */
.tp_article_inner img, .tp_article img {
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}